 |

There
is vast potential for our
countries to work together
on an ambitious agenda of
cooperation, bilaterally,
and with regard to what we
can do together to address
the global challenges.
Indian
Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh |
|
 |

The United States
and India, separated by
half the globe, are closer
than ever before, and the
partnership between our
free nations has the power
to transform the world.
US
President George Bush |
|
Natural
partner
"India
in the 21st century is a natural partner
of the United States because we are brothers
in the cause of human liberty. Yesterday,
I visited a memorial to Mahatma Gandhi,
and read the peaceful words of a fearless
man. His words are familiar in my country
because they helped move a generation of
Americans to overcome the injustice of racial
segregation. When Martin Luther King arrived
in Delhi in 1959, he said to other countries,
"I may go as a tourist, but to India,
I come as a pilgrim." I come to India
as a friend.
For
many years, the United States and India
were kept apart by the rivalries that divided
the world. That's changed. Our two great
democracies are now united by opportunities
that can lift our people, and by threats
that can bring down all our progress. The
United States and India, separated by half
the globe, are closer than ever before,
and the partnership between our free nations
has the power to transform the world."-
said President George W. Bush during his
India visit last year (March, 2006).
21st
century seems to have left all the bitterness
and misunderstandings between world's most
two lively Democracy and set a new tone
to come closer and stronger both politically
as well in the field of economic and trade
relations. From Pokhran to Kashmir to WTO
everywhere an air of trust and mutual cooperation
are building up. These two nations, as India
Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) says, find
their national interests converging at many
points in the beginning of the new millennium.
Currently,
India is the 21st
largest export destination for the US manufacturers
and ranks 18th among the countries
exporting to the US.
| |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
| Exports
to US (In million $) |
10686 |
9737 |
11818.3 |
13055.3 |
15572.0 |
18804.2 |
21826.3 |
| Growth
Rate (%) |
17.8 |
-8.8 |
21.4 |
10.44 |
19.2 |
20.75 |
16.07 |
| Imports
from US (In million $) |
3663 |
3757 |
4101.1 |
4979.7 |
6109.4 |
7989.4 |
10091.1 |
| Growth
Rate (%) |
-0.7 |
2.5 |
9.1 |
21.58 |
22.2 |
31 |
26.30 |
Balance
(+)
(In million $) |
7023 |
5980 |
7717.2 |
8075.6 |
9462.7 |
10814.8 |
11735.1 |
Over
last decade (1996-2006) Indo-US trade witnessed
significant growth and India is having a
comfortable balance of payment with its
largest trade partner. During this period
bilateral merchandize trade between the
two countries zoomed to $ 31.9 billion at
the end of calendar year 2006 from $ 10
billion in 1996. In 1996 India was the 32nd
largest market for US exports and the 25th
largest source of imports. In 2006, the
country ranks 21st biggest export market
for the US and 18th biggest supplier of
imports. When viewed in the context of India's
tripling of merchandise trade and imports
of services in a span of six years (1999-2005),
the burgeoning growth in the Indo-US trade
assumes great significance and emerges as
a major contributory factor in India's magnificent
performance in trade front. During his state
visit to India in March 2006 the US President
George Bush and the Indian Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh made a joint
statement that spoke of doubling the
Indo-US trade in next three years. In other
words by end of 2009, the bilateral trade
between these two countries are expected
to touch $ 60 billion. While talking about
Indo-US trade, an obvious issue that comes
to the fore is the emergence of China as
a competitor to the US. Significantly, Sino-Indian
trade also has grown manifold in last two
years. In terms of percentage growth, it
has already surpassed the trade with US.
If this trend continues, China may replace
US as India's largest trade partner in near
future.
|
Trade
ties:
Reaffirming
commitment *
India and the United States agree
that trade is essential to promoting
global economic growth, development,
freedom and prosperity.
We
fully share the goal of completing
the WTO Doha Development Agenda (DDA)
before the end of 2006, and agree
to work in partnership to help achieve
this outcome.
During
our discussions, we agreed to meet
the task with ambition, determination
and a readiness to contribute, consistent
with our roles in global trade, and
to keep the development dimension
in focus. The system of trading rules
to which our two great democracies
have contributed immensely must be
strengthened. Towards this global
cause, we recommit ourselves and invite
all key participants to demonstrate
their leadership.
We
agree that a successful Round depends
upon progress in all areas of the
negotiations if we are to meet our
goal of promoting development through
trade. We are committed to a DDA result
consistent with the mandates already
agreed that realize a substantial
outcome in all three pillars of the
agriculture negotiations (domestic
support, export competition and market
access); significant improvements
in market opportunities in manufacturing
and services; and appropriate disciplines,
including transparency of regulatory
practices in services. We also believe
we should strengthen the rules that
facilitate trade, where we have jointly
made proposals. Work in all these
areas must go hand in hand.
We
agree to pursue an ambitious agenda
for the first half of 2006,consistent
with the important milestones that
were set at the Hong Kong Ministerial
for agriculture, manufacturing, services
and other issues, and continuing to
press for the goal of concluding the
negotiations by the end of 2006.
We
will continue to work to promote reform,
respond to the concerns of developing
countries, and create opportunities
for growth for all. We are building
the trading system of the future,
where progressive liberalization and
reform result in improvement in standards
of living for all, in particular for
the millions of poor across the developing
world.
While
working for a successful Doha Round,
we also reaffirm our commitment to
strengthen and deepen bilateral trading
ties. We note with satisfaction the
successful implementation of our initiative
to create the U.S.-India Trade Policy
Forum and the CEO Forum to this end,
and in particular the achievements
in the areas of agricultural trade,
investment, trade in services, the
reduction of tariff and non-tariff
barriers to trade, and spurring innovation
and creativity. We agree to promote
innovation, creativity and technological
advancement by providing a vibrant
intellectual property rights regime.
As two dynamic economies with many
complementary interests, the U.S.
and India will seek to enhance bilateral
trade and investment ties by expanding
private sector contacts, dismantling
barriers to trade, building trade
capacities and strengthening trade-promoting
institutions.
March 2, 2006
*
Joint statement of President George
Bush & Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh issued by the Office
of the Press Secretary, White House
|
India's
bilateral trade with the United States,
its largest trading partner stood at $32
billion in 2006. Principal U.S. exports
include diagnostic or lab reagents, aircraft
and parts, advanced machinery, cotton, fertilizers,
ferrous waste/scrap metal, and computer
hardware. India's principal exports to the
US include textiles and ready-made garments,
Internet-enabled services, agricultural
and related products, gems and jewelry,
leather products, and chemicals.
In
terms of foreign investment also the US
is India's largest partner accounting for
13 percent of total foreign investment in
India. Total inflow of U.S. direct
investment into India is estimated at more
than $9 billion through 2006. A US government
report says that proposals for direct foreign
investment are considered by the Foreign
Investment Promotion Board and generally
receive government approval. Automatic approvals
are available for investments involving
up to 100 percent foreign equity, depending
on the kind of industry. Foreign investment
is particularly sought after in power generation,
telecommunications, ports, roads, petroleum
exploration/processing, and mining.
Like
many other countries, the US business and
industry also identified Infrastructure
and Bureaucracy as two major impediments
in stepping up India's bilateral trade and
investments flow into India. While country's
Finance Minister P Chidambaram admits need
for massive investments in infrastructure
sector that includes roads, rails, ports
( seas & air) and power and need for
a more liberal foreign investment policy,
the Indian federal government estimate puts
investment requirement for infrastructure
at around $ 350 billion for next five years
(which would be more or less covering the
11th Plan period). Such a massive fund requirement
could be met by three major sources: country's
foreign exchange reserves; foreign investments
and private sector investments including
Public Private Participation (PPP).
So
far as foreign investment is concerned,
there has been marked improvement in the
American investments in India. Compared
with $ 2 billion increase in the US investments
in India between 1990-2000, the US investment
in the following five years ( 2001-2005)
grew by $ 6 billion to $ 8.5 billion.
At
a meeting of the Indo-American Chamber of
Commerce U.S. Attorney Michael Kraus
while inviting India Inc to invest in
the US said:
"Compared
with India, it is neither expensive nor
time-consuming to set up firms in the U.S.
It can be established even by a single person
with $1 and, that too, within a day. There
is also no need to have minimum capital.”
The outbound investment from India during
2006-2007 was $2 billion through 46 deals,
with information technology-enabled services
accounting for 48 percent. Small and mid-sized
deals, ranging from $20 to $60 million,
occupied the centre stage.
“If
you are planning to acquire firms in the
U.S., do it with due diligence with regard
to the technical, financial and legal aspect
properly. Don’t go for firms that offer
service at lesser rates. Due diligence does
not lead to closure of deal. It opens an
argument on purchase price. Probably, you
could get the company for a better rate,”
Kraus put a note of caution to the Indian
investors.
|
In quest
of prosperity*
President
George W. Bush and Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh today expressed
satisfaction with the great progress
the United States and India have made
in advancing our strategic partnership
to meet the global challenges of the
21st century. Both our countries are
linked by a deep commitment to freedom
and democracy; a celebration of national
diversity, human creativity and innovation;
a quest to expand prosperity and economic
opportunity worldwide; and a desire
to increase mutual security against
the common threats posed by intolerance,
terrorism, and the spread of weapons
of mass destruction. The successful
transformation of the U.S.-India relationship
will have a decisive and positive
influence on the future international
system as it evolves in this new century.
Reviewing
the progress made in deepening the
global partnership between the United
States and India since their Joint
Statement of July 18, 2005, the President
and the Prime Minister reaffirm their
commitment to expand even further
the growing ties between their two
countries. Consistent with this objective,
the two leaders wish to highlight
efforts the United States and India
are making together in the following
areas, where they have:
FOR
ECONOMIC PROSPERITY AND TRADE
(1)
Agreed to intensify efforts to develop
a bilateral business climate supportive
of trade and investment by:
-
Welcoming
the report of the U.S.-India CEO
Forum, agreeing to consider its
recommendations aimed at substantially
broadening our bilateral economic
relations, and directing the Chairs
of the Indo-U.S. Economic Dialogue
to follow up expeditiously with
the CEO Forum;
-
Endorsing
the efforts of the U.S.-India
Trade Policy Forum to reduce barriers
to trade and investment with the
goal of doubling bilateral trade
in three years;
-
Agreeing
to advance mutually beneficial
bilateral trade and investment
flows by holding a high-level
public-private investment summit
in 2006, continuing efforts to
facilitate and promote foreign
direct investment and eliminate
impediments to it, and enhancing
bilateral consultations on various
issues including tariff and non-tariff
barriers to trade in goods and
services, and preventing the illicit
use of the financial system.
(2)
Sought to expand cooperation in agriculture
by:
- Launching
the Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture
with a three-year financial commitment
to link our universities, technical
institutions, and businesses to
support agriculture education,
joint research, and capacity building
projects including in the area
of biotechnology.
- Endorsing
an agreed workplan to promote
bilateral trade in agriculture
through agreements that: lay out
a path to open the U.S. market
to Indian mangoes, recognize India
as having the authority to certify
that shipments of Indian products
to the United States meet USDA
organic standards, and provide
for discussions on current regulations
affecting trade in fresh fruits
and vegetables, poultry and dairy,
and almond
(3)
Reaffirmed their shared commitment
to completing the WTO Doha Development
Agenda (DDA) before the end of 2006,
and agreed to work together to help
achieve this outcome.
FOR
ENERGY SECURITY AND A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT
(1)
Welcomed the successful completion
of discussions on India's separation
plan and looked forward to the full
implementation of the commitments
in the July 18, 2005 Joint Statement
on nuclear cooperation. This historic
accomplishment will permit our countries
to move forward towards our common
objective of full civil nuclear energy
cooperation between India and the
United States and between India and
the international community as a whole.
(2)
Welcomed the participation of India
in the ITER initiative on fusion energy
as an important further step towards
the common goal of full nuclear energy
cooperation.
(3)
Agreed on India's participation in
FutureGen, an international public-private
partnership to develop new, commercially
viable technology for a clean coal
near-zero emission power project.
India will contribute funding to the
project and participate in the Government
Steering Committee of this initiative.
(4)
Welcomed the creation of the Asia
Pacific Partnership on Clean Development
and Climate, which will enable India
and the U.S. to work together with
other countries in the region to pursue
sustainable development and meet increased
energy needs while addressing concerns
of energy security and climate change.
The Partnership will collaborate to
promote the development, diffusion,
deployment and transfer of cleaner,
cost-effective and more efficient
technologies and practices.
(5)
Welcomed India's interest in the Integrated
Ocean Drilling Program, an international
marine research endeavor that will
contribute to long-term energy solutions
such as gas hydrates.
(6)
Noting the positive cooperation under
the Indo-U.S. Energy Dialogue, highlighted
plans to hold joint conferences on
topics such as energy efficiency and
natural gas, to conduct study missions
on renewable energy, to establish
a clearing house in India for coal-bed
methane/coal-mine methane, and to
exchange energy market information.
FOR
INNOVATION AND THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
(1)
Emphasizing the importance of knowledge
partnerships, announced the establishment
of a Bi-National Science and Technology
Commission which the U.S. and India
will co-fund. It will generate collaborative
partnerships in science and technology
and promote industrial research and
development.
(2)
Agreed that the United States and
India would work together to promote
innovation, creativity and technological
advancement by providing a vibrant
intellectual property rights regime,
and to cooperate in the field of intellectual
property rights to include capacity
building activities, human resource
development and public awareness programs.
(3)
Agreed to continue exploring further
cooperation in civil space, including
areas such as space exploration, satellite
navigation, and earth science. The
United States and India committed
to move forward with agreements that
will permit the launch of U.S. satellites
and satellites containing U.S. components
by Indian space launch vehicles, opening
up new opportunities for commercial
space cooperation between the two
countries.
(4)
Welcomed the inclusion of two U.S.
instruments in the Indian lunar mission
Chandrayaan-1. They noted that memoranda
of understanding to be signed by ISRO
and NASA would be significant steps
forward in this area.
(5)
Welcomed the U.S. Department of Commerce's
plan to create a license exception
for items that would otherwise require
an export license to end-users in
India engaged solely in civilian activities.
FOR
GLOBAL SAFETY AND SECURITY
(1)
Noted the enhanced counter-terrorism
cooperation between the two countries
and stressed that terrorism is a global
scourge that must be fought and rooted
out in every part of the world.
(2)
Welcomed the increased cooperation
between the United States and India
in the defense area, since the New
Framework for the U.S.-India Defence
Relationship was signed on June 28,
2005, as evidenced by successful joint
exercises, expanded defence cooperation
and information sharing, and greater
opportunities to jointly develop technologies
and address security and humanitarian
issues.
(3)
Reaffirmed their commitment to the
protection of the free flow of commerce
and to the safety of navigation, and
agreed to the conclusion of a Maritime
Cooperation Framework to enhance security
in the maritime domain, to prevent
piracy and other transnational crimes
at sea, carry out search and rescue
operations, combat marine pollution,
respond to natural disasters, address
emergent threats and enhance cooperative
capabilities, including through logistics
support. Both sides are working to
finalize a Logistics Support Agreement
at the earliest.
(4)
Welcomed India's intention to join
the Container Security Initiative
aimed at making global maritime trade
and infrastructure more secure and
reducing the risk of shipping containers
being used to conceal weapons of mass
destruction.
(5)
Reiterated their commitment to international
efforts to prevent the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction.
(6)
Building on the July 2005 Disaster
Relief Initiative, noted the important
disaster management cooperation and
their improved capabilities to respond
to disaster situations.
(7)
Recognized the importance of capacity
building in cyber security and greater
cooperation to secure their growing
electronic interdependencies, including
to protect electronic transactions
and critical infrastructure from cybercrime,
terrorism and other malicious threats.
DEEPENING
DEMOCRACY AND MEETING INTERNATIONAL
CHALLENGES
(1)
Recalled their joint launch of the
UN Democracy Fund in September 2005
and offered the experience and expertise
of both Governments for capacity building,
training and exchanges to third countries
that request such assistance to strengthen
democratic institutions.
(2)
Welcomed the decision of India and
the United States to designate a representative
to the Government Advisory Board of
the International Centre for Democratic
Transition (ICDT) located in Budapest
to facilitate cooperative activities
with ICDT.
(3)
Agreed that the Virtual Coordination
and Information Centres set up in
September 2005 should be further strengthened
and a bilateral meeting aimed at developing
a practical programme for utilization
of its services be held soon.
(4)
Expressed satisfaction at the expedited
USFDA drug approval processes that
strengthen the combat against HIV/AIDS
at the global level and encourage
greater corporate participation to
meet this challenge, including the
establishment of the Indo-U.S. Corporate
Fund for HIV/AIDS.
(5)
Agreed to expand bilateral efforts
and continue cooperation in the area
of medical research and strengthen
technical capacity in food and drug
regulation in India as well as address
the concern on avian influenza, including
agreement to reach out to the private
sector, develop regional communications
strategies, and plan an in-region
containment and response exercise.
The President welcomed India's offer
to host the International Partnership
on Avian and Pandemic Influenza meeting
in 2007.
(6)
Welcomed India's membership in the
Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking,
a partnership through which we will
collaborate in the fight against illegal
trade in wildlife and wildlife parts;
we also welcome the opportunity to
strengthen longstanding work together
on the conservation of wildlife through
cooperation on park management and
ecotourism.
President
Bush thanked Prime Minister Singh
and the people of India for the warmth
of their reception and the generosity
of their hospitality.
March
2, 2006
*
Joint statement of President George
Bush & Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh issued by the Office of the
Press Secretary, White House
|
On
US-India trade relations Sanjay Puri, Chairman
of the US India Business Alliance said:
“Positive trends and policies notwithstanding,
there are a number of ways USINPAC believes
U.S.-India trade relations can still be
enhanced. One of these areas is to open
discussions on forming a Free Trade Agreement
(FTA) between the two countries.” said
Mr. Sanjay Puri, Chairman of the
US India Political Action Committee (USINPAC)
in an interview
with indiaonestop.com.
|
USINPAC
: Ambassador
for India abroad
THE
U.S. India Political Action Committee
(USINPAC) delegation of prominent
business leaders, entrepreneurs, political
activists, and professionals from
the Indian-American community is back
home after their week-long India visit
with the message from the Indian Commerce
Minister Kamal Nath that the U.S.-India
Civilian Nuclear Agreement process
is “not thrown away”.
The delegation that dialogued with
senior Indian government officials
at the federal and state levels about
the U.S.-India relationship, the growth
of the Indian economy, and other important
domestic issues was told that the
Indian American community plays an
important ambassadorial role for India
abroad.
|
One theme woven through all the meetings
was the importance of the Indian-American
community and its continued engagement,
and the role played by USINPAC in
encouraging, informing and fostering
that engagement. "All ethnic
communities abroad maintain ties to
their countries of origin, but the
Indian-American community is particularly
strong and focused in this regard,
says Sanjay Puri, USINPAC Chairman
and leader of the delegation. "Just
as all Diasporas are not equally connected,
so too not all home countries are
as welcoming of their involvement
as we always see time and time again
on these visits with the Indian government
and the society as a whole."
The
USINPAC delegation was particularly
interested in what Kamal Nath, the
Minister of Commerce and Industry,
had to say about the status of the
U.S.-India Civilian Nuclear Agreement
process. "There is a delay undoubtedly
in the nuclear deal but it is not
thrown away," said Minister Nath.
The Minister went on to emphasis that
additional time in the process should
not alarm anyone given that this represents
very new waters for both the American
and Indian governments and so too
their respective citizens as well.
Another
important topic for Minister Nath
was the role that the Indian-American
community and USINPAC can and should
play as educators and advocates in
the United States on the realities
of globalization. The Minister sees
globalization as positively intertwining
and benefiting the economies of the
two countries.
Ashwini
Kumar, the Minister of Industry, echoed
the Commerce Minister’s thanks
to the Indian-American community as
fulfilling an important ambassadorial
role for India abroad, and described
the community as catalysts of change
evident in the work on the nuclear
deal and how the relationship with
the United States has evolved from
one driven by ideology to one driven
by identity. "Over ninety percent
of Indians feel socially, intellectually,
and even culturally closer to America
than anyone else in the world,"
Minister Kumar stated.
|
While
at the government and industry-business
levels efforts are being stepped up and
more and more initiatives taken to strengthen
the Indo-US bilateral relations on all fronts
-- from education and culture to foreign
trade- another major contributory factor
in cementing the bilateral relations between
these two countries is the growing political
clout of 2.5 million Indian Americans. The
US India Political Action Committee (USINPAC),
the voice of the Indian American community
is playing a very significant a positive
role with the help of the India Caucus both
in the Congress and the Senate irrespective
of their political shades, the most recent
example being the Indo-US Civil Nuclear
Cooperation Agreement. USINPAC's
grassroots analysts have found that regardless
of whether Indian
Americans are registered Republicans or
Democrats, the community is united in its
desire to see the successful conclusion
of the US-India
Nuclear Agreement.
Now with the passage of confidence reposed in the Congress(I)-led UPA government
by the majority of peoples' representatives in country's Parliament, India
is now all set to finalize the Safegurads Agreement with the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and later on to scale it up to Nuclear
Suppliers Group (NSG) as a follow up of signing the
123
Act with the US for civilian nuclear cooperation in 2007.
The Draft Safeguards Agreement with IAEA, once finalized, will "enable
India to cooperate in civil nuclear energy development with all the 45
member countries of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, including USA, Russia,
France and China", claims country's Prime Minister Dr Manmohan
Singh. However, the four-party Left alliance that had been supporting
the Congress(I)-led UPA government for last four years withdrew its support
apprehending that the
Safeguards
Agreement with IAEA would threaten India's sovereignty. The Prime
Minister will have to burry the Left apprehension in due course
making all the Civilian Nuclear agreement related issues more transparent
and convincing.
"The
IAEA safeguards agreement will enable India to cooperate in civil nuclear
energy development with all the 45 member countries of the Nuclear Suppliers
Group, including USA, Russia, France and China. He said that concluding
the agreements would end the era of nuclear apartheid against India. He
said the agreement will in no way impinge on our strategic programme,
which is entirely outside the purview of the IAEA safeguards agreement",
the Prime Minister told the senior journalists on July 15.He asserted
that "India would never allow any extraneous interference in
the conduct of its independent foreign policy and India would continue
to seek good relations with all our Asian neighbours."
In
fact, about a year back after the signing of the Indo-US Civilian Nuclear
Cooperation Agreement Indian External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee
had belied the apprehension of those opposed to the 123 Agreement and
said: "India has the sovereign right to test and would do so if it
is necessary in national interest. The only restraint in our voluntary
unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing, declared by the previous government
and being continued by the successor government. There is nothing in the
bilateral agreement that would tie the hands of a future government or
legally constrain its options. A decision to undertake a future nuclear
test would be India’s sovereign decision, resting solely with the
Government of India.
Nowhere
in the bilateral agreement on Cooperation for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear
Energy with the United States of America is testing mentioned. The bilateral
cooperation agreement contains elaborate provisions in Articles 5 and
14 to ensure the continuous operation of India’s reactors. These
include fuel supply assurances, the right to take corrective measures,
and a strategic fuel reserve for the lifetime of India’s reactors
in case of cessation of cooperation."
On
the other hand the Opposition Leader in Parliament L. K. Advani said "the
BJP wants to see friendly relations between India and the United States.
Indeed, as the world’s largest democracy and the world’s strongest
democracy, I believe that our two countries should forge a strategic partnership
to pursue common goals. It goes without saying that India should also
simultaneously deepen friendship and cooperation with all the other major
powers – Russia, Japan and others -- in today’s world, which
we want to see as a multi-polar world tomorrow. A multi-polar world in
which India itself becomes an important pole, working for the welfare
of the entire mankind.
"..we
want a strategic partnership with the US on equal terms. The BJP will
never support a relationship with any country, howsoever strong and powerful
it may be, in which India becomes its client or a subservient partner"
he said in Parliament on July 21.
"The
Nuclear Deal in its present form is nothing but acceptance of severe curbs
on our strategic weapons programme. All the American interlocutors, whether
belong to the Republican Party or the Democratic Party or are independent
experts, have made it clear that, as far as their country is concerned,
their principal objective is to bring India into the Non-Proliferation
Regime. What they want fits in well with the critical stand that Dr. Manmohan
Singh took after Pokharan II in 1998. Both want India to come within the
Non-Proliferation Regime dictated by the US.
"Therefore,
the Nuclear Deal in its present form means that India will not be allowed
to perform Pokharan III or Pokharan IV, without inviting termination of
the agreement and severe punitive action. This is unacceptable to my party,
to the NDA, to the majority of MPs in this House, and to the people at
large", Advani said.
Commenting
on Indian Parliament’s clearance of the government’s move
to operatiolaize the nuke deal once it is through at IAEA and NSG levels
the US-India Political Action Committee (USINPAC) chairman
Sanjay Puri said: "As this is a truly historic accord, so
too this is a historic victory for the government of Prime Minister Singh
and all Indians. The agreement benefits both countries on several levels,
strategically, politically and economically, and it will usher in a new
positive era of broadened and deepened cooperation between the oldest
democracy and the largest democracy."
"We
will rally the Indian-American community and engage all like-minded allies
to ensure this deal gets included in the US Congressional calendar for
this year. We look forward to the day that this important milestone in
US-India relations is finalized," he said.
The growing political clout of the Indian American community
also reflected in the sweeping victory of
Piyush 'Bobby' Jindal
in the race to Louisiana Governorship.
|
India Inc.:
Deepening engagement *
"India
Inc's engagement with the world has
deepened significantly since 2000,
with trade and investment flows in
and out of India at historic highs
and rising rapidly.
The increased flow of investment in
and out of India is especially significant.
India's global FDI has been surging
- tripling in the first half of this
year to roughly $11 billion - on the
heels of last year's record $16 billion
for the entire year. These numbers,
which for nearly a decade stayed around
$3 billion annually, now reflect India's
growth and dynamism.
New areas of investment have come
up in the wake of successful reforms,
including financial service companies,
construction (including highways),
telecom and transportation.
In fact, investment in the services
sector last year surged ahead of IT,
while construction investment grew
by a factor of six.
FDI from the U.S. has now begun to
fulfill expectations. Although
the U.S. has been India's largest
investor for many years, flows hovered
for years around a modest average
of $400 million annually. Now,
American investment is growing by
50% per year - to nearly $900 million
in FY07. If we could track investments
made through Mauritius, this number
would no doubt be considerably higher.
Notable too, last year saw the convergence
of institutional and direct investment.
Historically, portfolio investment
has vastly outstripped FDI, but in
FY07, FDI beat Foreign Institutional
Investment, reflecting investors'
growing confidence in India's long-term
future, rather than the attractions
of current high valuations.
Just as powerful is the surge in outward
FDI, putting India on the map as a
source, not just a destination, for
investment.
Last year, India Inc. invested $9
billion outside India, more than quadrupling
a rough average of $2 billion in the
first part of this decade. Tata's
Corus deal and Hindalco's purchase
of Novelis helped propel India's outbound
mergers and acquisitions during the
first half of 2007 to second place
in the world behind Australia.
U.S. financial firms are helping Indian
corporations utilize global capital
to become major players and employers
in world markets.
Demonstrating the two way nature of
Indo-U.S. economic engagement, the
U.S. has long been one of the largest
recipients of Indian investment, receiving
roughly one-fifth of India's investments
abroad. Indian investment in
the U.S. is now spreading from an
IT focus into other sectors, including
pharmaceuticals and manufacturing,
such as the Mahindras' tractor factories
in the U.S.
Certainly, these multiple facets of
India's deeper engagement with the
global economy have helped propel
India's growth rate to 9 percent levels,
a feat that should be repeated this
year, again helping to raise people
out of poverty and bringing more into
India's middle class.
These market-changing investment flows
reflect how India's private sector
is clearly exploiting the benefits
of recent reforms and liberalization,
driving economic growth and employment.
Continued reform and liberalization
will help further boost this surging
momentum and spread the benefits of
rapid economic growth to more recipients
across India.
One engine to advance macroeconomic
activity across India is further liberalization
in India's banking and financial markets."
*Extracts
from speech delivered by David C.
Mulford, US Ambassador to India at
the 4th Indo-U.S. Economic Summit
"Building Strong Partnerships"
on September 18, 2007
|
The Indian government had effected
a large number of tariff reductions three
years back in 2004. Major relief included:
Reduction of peak tariff rates by 5 percent,
to 20 percent; Elimination of the 4 percent
special additional duty; Reduction of customs
duties on equipment for projects from 25
percent to 10 percent; Reductions in duties
on meters and items related to electricity
transmission and distribution; Sharp reductions
on information technology and electronic
equipment, including cell phones and computers;
Major reductions in life-saving drugs and
equipment, and other medical items; Reduction
or elimination of excises and taxes on air
travel, air fuel and related items; Exemption
from custom and excise duties available
to drinking water supply projects. In addition,
the Government of India announced several
measures to streamline customs processing,
ease restrictions on imports of personal
or household products, and enable electronic
tax filing.
|
India's
trade with USA ( FY 2002-03 to 2006-07
(In
million $)
|
| |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
| Export |
10,895.76 |
11,490.11 |
13,765.75 |
17,353.06 |
18,866.17 |
| India's
Total Export |
52,719.43 |
63,842.97 |
83,535.94 |
103.090.54 |
126,361.46 |
| %
Share |
20.67 |
18 |
16.48 |
16.83 |
14.93 |
| Import |
4,443.58 |
5,034.86 |
7,001.35 |
9,454.74 |
11,736.13 |
| India's
Total Import |
61,412.13 |
61,412.13 |
78,149.61 |
111,517.44 |
149,165.73 |
| %
Share |
7.24 |
6.44 |
6.28 |
6.34 |
6.32 |
| Total
Trade |
15,339.34 |
16,524.97 |
20,767.10 |
26807.81 |
30,602.30 |
| India's
Total Trade |
114,131.56 |
141,992.58 |
195,053.38 |
252,256.27 |
312,110.76 |
| %
Share |
13.44 |
11.64 |
10.65 |
10.63 |
9.8 |
| Trade
balance |
6,452.18 |
6,455.25 |
6,764.40 |
7,898.32 |
7,130.04 |
| India's
Trade Balance |
-8692.70 |
-14,306.65 |
-27,981.49 |
-46,075.19 |
-59,387.85 |
| Exchange
rate ($ 1= Rs) |
48.3953 |
45.9513 |
44.9315 |
44.2735 |
45.2495 |
SOURCE: Federal
Ministry of Commerce, Government of
India
FY : Financial
Year ( April-March) |
All
these led to substantial reduction in average
tariff rate in India. From average of 35.3
percent with a peak of 260 percent in 1997-98
(as stated in a
WTO report) it has come down substantially
to 19.5 percent in 2005. For fiscal 2006-07,
the rate for agri products stood at 30 percent
and 12.5 percent for non-agri products.
There are certain items, textiles mainly,
that fall under two-track duty system- one
calculated on a percentage basis and the
other is on kilogram or square metre basis.
Despite a much more liberalized tariff and
import policy, the USTR report (
2007) on Trade Barriers has pointed out
to Indian Customs authorities complicated
documentation procedures and application
of discretionary customs valuation criteria
to import transactions. The report also
made special mention about India's standards
and certification requirements. The scientific
basis of the standards is questioned in
the report.
|
Making
history............
IN less than a year since the
Republican became the first Indian-American
to be elected to the US Congress in
46 years, the 36-year-old non-white Rhodes Scholar and the first Indian-American to head a state, Piyush
‘Bobby’ Jindal’s outright win in Louisiana Governor’s race once again proved the
growing and strong political clout
of the Indian-American community.
Stating that Jindal “ is a role model
for young Indian-Americans who look
to public service as a life mission”
The youngest US Governor-elect however retorted back during
his campaign trail: “people want to
make everything about race. The only
colors that matter here are red, white
and blue.” Referring to the
proposed legislation on real ethics
reform Jindal in his victory
speech said : "But please
understand this: I'm not going to
take "no" for an answer
on reforming our ethics laws.
|
Piyush
‘Bobby’ Jindal (born
June 10, 1971, in Baton Rouge),
a Rhodes scholar, was elected
the first non-white Governor-elect
of the U.S. State of Louisiana
on the Republican ticket. He
was Louisiana's health secretary
at age 24, president of the
University of Louisiana at age
28.
President George W. Bush
appointed him as Assistant Secretary
of Health and Human Services
at age 30. Elected to the U.S.
House of Representatives from
the 1st district of Louisiana
at age 33, and re-elected to
the same seat in the U.S. Congress
by an overwhelming 88 percent
majority in 2006.
The
first Indian American governor
in U.S. history got 54 percent
of the total vote. His nearest
rival, Democrat Walter Boasso
got 18 percent. Outgoing Democratic
Governor Kathleen Blanco decided
to not run again after she was
widely criticized for her handling
of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina
crisis. Jindal took his
oath as Governor of Louisiana
on January 14, 2008. |
ETHICS :
THE
CENTERPIECE
AS
the first Indian-American
elected as governor and the
youngest sitting governor at the
age of thirty-six, Governor
Bobby Jindal looks to continue
making history by fulfilling his
campaign pledge of ridding the
state of Louisiana of its
reputation for corrupt
government. After his
inauguration Monday, some of
Governor Jindal's first
executive orders created new
financial disclosure rules for
cabinet members and established
transparency of how tax dollars
are spent by posting a report
online of all state grants and
contracts so taxpayers will know
where their money is going.
"Governor Jindal made ethics a
centerpiece of his campaign, but
previous reform-minded governors
in Louisiana have had
short-lived careers," says
Michael Taylor, Director of
Government Affairs for the
U.S.-India Business Alliance (USIBA).
"If he is to be successful in
rewriting history here, then he
will need a great deal of help;
both political and economic help
and local and national help," he
added.
State Representative Jane Smith
(District 8), the newly elected
Chair of the House Republican
Delegation, told USIBA that
"truly there is a feeling of
great excitement that with Bobby
Jindal as our Governor we will
be able to move the reform
agenda forward. I support
Governor Jindal in his efforts
to change the image of this
state, give tax relief to our
businesses and better manage the
budget of this state. It will
take support from Democrats
as well as Republicans, and I
believe we will have that. I
|
also believe that the
powerful 50 delegation Republicans
in the House will be the catalyst to
move that reform agenda forward.
It's a bright day in Louisiana."
The other focus contained in the
first executive orders of Governor
Jindal is the rebuilding of
post-Katrina Louisiana. USIBA calls
on the Indian-American business
community to assist him in that
rebuilding. Those parts of the
American economy where
Indian-Americans are most prevalent
as business leaders - hospitali | |