There is vast potential for our countries to work together on an ambitious agenda of cooperation, bilaterally, and with regard to what we can do together to address the global challenges.

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh


The United States and India, separated by half the globe, are closer than ever before, and the partnership between our free nations has the power to transform the world.

US President George Bush

Natural partner

"India in the 21st century is a natural partner of the United States because we are brothers in the cause of human liberty. Yesterday, I visited a memorial to Mahatma Gandhi, and read the peaceful words of a fearless man. His words are familiar in my country because they helped move a generation of Americans to overcome the injustice of racial segregation. When Martin Luther King arrived in Delhi in 1959, he said to other countries, "I may go as a tourist, but to India, I come as a pilgrim." I come to India as a friend.

For many years, the United States and India were kept apart by the rivalries that divided the world. That's changed. Our two great democracies are now united by opportunities that can lift our people, and by threats that can bring down all our progress. The United States and India, separated by half the globe, are closer than ever before, and the partnership between our free nations has the power to transform the world."- said President George W. Bush during his India visit last year (March, 2006).

21st century seems to have left all the bitterness and misunderstandings between world's most two lively Democracy and set a new tone to come closer and stronger both politically as well in the field of economic and trade relations. From Pokhran to Kashmir to WTO everywhere an air of trust and mutual cooperation are building up. These two nations, as India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) says, find their national interests converging at many points in the beginning of the new millennium. Currently, India is the 21st largest export destination for the US manufacturers and ranks 18th among the countries exporting to the US.  

  2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Exports to US (In million $) 10686 9737 11818.3 13055.3 15572.0 18804.2 21826.3
Growth Rate (%) 17.8 -8.8 21.4 10.44 19.2 20.75 16.07
Imports from US (In million $) 3663 3757 4101.1 4979.7 6109.4 7989.4 10091.1
Growth Rate (%) -0.7 2.5 9.1 21.58 22.2 31 26.30
Balance (+) 
(In million $)
7023 5980 7717.2 8075.6 9462.7 10814.8 11735.1

Over last decade (1996-2006) Indo-US trade witnessed significant growth and India is having a comfortable balance of payment with its largest trade partner. During this period bilateral merchandize trade between the two countries zoomed to $ 31.9 billion at the end of calendar year 2006 from $ 10 billion in 1996. In 1996 India was the 32nd largest market for US exports and the 25th largest source of imports. In 2006, the country ranks 21st biggest export market for the US and 18th biggest supplier of imports. When viewed in the context of India's tripling of merchandise trade and imports of services in a span of six years (1999-2005), the burgeoning growth in the Indo-US trade assumes great significance and emerges as a major contributory factor in India's magnificent performance in trade front. During his state visit to India in March 2006 the US President George Bush and the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made a joint statement that spoke of doubling the Indo-US trade in next three years. In other words by end of 2009, the bilateral trade between these two countries are expected to touch $ 60 billion. While talking about Indo-US trade, an obvious issue that comes to the fore is the emergence of China as a competitor to the US. Significantly, Sino-Indian trade also has grown manifold in last two years. In terms of percentage growth, it has already surpassed the trade with US. If this trend continues, China may replace US as India's largest trade partner in near future. 


Trade ties: Reaffirming commitment *

India and the United States agree that trade is essential to promoting global economic growth, development, freedom and prosperity.

We fully share the goal of completing the WTO Doha Development Agenda (DDA) before the end of 2006, and agree to work in partnership to help achieve this outcome.

During our discussions, we agreed to meet the task with ambition, determination and a readiness to contribute, consistent with our roles in global trade, and to keep the development dimension in focus. The system of trading rules to which our two great democracies have contributed immensely must be strengthened. Towards this global cause, we recommit ourselves and invite all key participants to demonstrate their leadership.

We agree that a successful Round depends upon progress in all areas of the negotiations if we are to meet our goal of promoting development through trade. We are committed to a DDA result consistent with the mandates already agreed that realize a substantial outcome in all three pillars of the agriculture negotiations (domestic support, export competition and market access); significant improvements in market opportunities in manufacturing and services; and appropriate disciplines, including transparency of regulatory practices in services. We also believe we should strengthen the rules that facilitate trade, where we have jointly made proposals. Work in all these areas must go hand in hand.

We agree to pursue an ambitious agenda for the first half of 2006,consistent with the important milestones that were set at the Hong Kong Ministerial for agriculture, manufacturing, services and other issues, and continuing to press for the goal of concluding the negotiations by the end of 2006.

We will continue to work to promote reform, respond to the concerns of developing countries, and create opportunities for growth for all. We are building the trading system of the future, where progressive liberalization and reform result in improvement in standards of living for all, in particular for the millions of poor across the developing world.

While working for a successful Doha Round, we also reaffirm our commitment to strengthen and deepen bilateral trading ties. We note with satisfaction the successful implementation of our initiative to create the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum and the CEO Forum to this end, and in particular the achievements in the areas of agricultural trade, investment, trade in services, the reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade, and spurring innovation and creativity. We agree to promote innovation, creativity and technological advancement by providing a vibrant intellectual property rights regime. As two dynamic economies with many complementary interests, the U.S. and India will seek to enhance bilateral trade and investment ties by expanding private sector contacts, dismantling barriers to trade, building trade capacities and strengthening trade-promoting institutions.

March 2, 2006

* Joint statement of President George Bush & Prime Minister Manmohan Singh issued by the Office of the Press Secretary, White House

India's bilateral trade with the United States, its largest trading partner stood at $32 billion in 2006. Principal U.S. exports include diagnostic or lab reagents, aircraft and parts, advanced machinery, cotton, fertilizers, ferrous waste/scrap metal, and computer hardware. India's principal exports to the US include textiles and ready-made garments, Internet-enabled services, agricultural and related products, gems and jewelry, leather products, and chemicals.  

In terms of foreign investment also the US is India's largest partner accounting for 13 percent of total foreign investment in India.  Total inflow of U.S. direct investment into India is estimated at more than $9 billion through 2006. A US government report says that proposals for direct foreign investment are considered by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board and generally receive government approval. Automatic approvals are available for investments involving up to 100 percent foreign equity, depending on the kind of industry. Foreign investment is particularly sought after in power generation, telecommunications, ports, roads, petroleum exploration/processing, and mining.

Like many other countries, the US business and industry also identified Infrastructure and Bureaucracy as two major impediments in stepping up India's bilateral trade and investments flow into India. While country's Finance Minister P Chidambaram admits need for massive investments in infrastructure sector that includes roads, rails, ports ( seas & air) and power and need for a more liberal foreign investment policy, the Indian federal government estimate puts investment requirement for infrastructure at around $ 350 billion for next five years (which would be more or less covering the 11th Plan period). Such a massive fund requirement could be met by three major sources: country's foreign exchange reserves; foreign investments and private sector investments including Public Private Participation (PPP).

So far as foreign investment is concerned, there has been marked improvement in the American investments in India. Compared with $ 2 billion increase in the US investments in India between 1990-2000, the US investment in the following five years ( 2001-2005) grew by $ 6 billion to $ 8.5 billion. 

At a meeting of the Indo-American Chamber of Commerce U.S. Attorney Michael Kraus while inviting India Inc to invest in the US said: "Compared with India, it is neither expensive nor time-consuming to set up firms in the U.S. It can be established even by a single person with $1 and, that too, within a day. There is also no need to have minimum capital.” The outbound investment from India during 2006-2007 was $2 billion through 46 deals, with information technology-enabled services accounting for 48 percent. Small and mid-sized deals, ranging from $20 to $60 million, occupied the centre stage.

“If you are planning to acquire firms in the U.S., do it with due diligence with regard to the technical, financial and legal aspect properly. Don’t go for firms that offer service at lesser rates. Due diligence does not lead to closure of deal. It opens an argument on purchase price. Probably, you could get the company for a better rate,” Kraus put a note of caution to the Indian investors.

 

In quest of prosperity* 

President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today expressed satisfaction with the great progress the United States and India have made in advancing our strategic partnership to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. Both our countries are linked by a deep commitment to freedom and democracy; a celebration of national diversity, human creativity and innovation; a quest to expand prosperity and economic opportunity worldwide; and a desire to increase mutual security against the common threats posed by intolerance, terrorism, and the spread of weapons of mass destruction. The successful transformation of the U.S.-India relationship will have a decisive and positive influence on the future international system as it evolves in this new century.

Reviewing the progress made in deepening the global partnership between the United States and India since their Joint Statement of July 18, 2005, the President and the Prime Minister reaffirm their commitment to expand even further the growing ties between their two countries. Consistent with this objective, the two leaders wish to highlight efforts the United States and India are making together in the following areas, where they have:

FOR ECONOMIC PROSPERITY AND TRADE

(1) Agreed to intensify efforts to develop a bilateral business climate supportive of trade and investment by:

  1. Welcoming the report of the U.S.-India CEO Forum, agreeing to consider its recommendations aimed at substantially broadening our bilateral economic relations, and directing the Chairs of the Indo-U.S. Economic Dialogue to follow up expeditiously with the CEO Forum;
  2. Endorsing the efforts of the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum to reduce barriers to trade and investment with the goal of doubling bilateral trade in three years;
  3. Agreeing to advance mutually beneficial bilateral trade and investment flows by holding a high-level public-private investment summit in 2006, continuing efforts to facilitate and promote foreign direct investment and eliminate impediments to it, and enhancing bilateral consultations on various issues including tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade in goods and services, and preventing the illicit use of the financial system.

(2) Sought to expand cooperation in agriculture by:

  1. Launching the Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture with a three-year financial commitment to link our universities, technical institutions, and businesses to support agriculture education, joint research, and capacity building projects including in the area of biotechnology.
  2. Endorsing an agreed workplan to promote bilateral trade in agriculture through agreements that: lay out a path to open the U.S. market to Indian mangoes, recognize India as having the authority to certify that shipments of Indian products to the United States meet USDA organic standards, and provide for discussions on current regulations affecting trade in fresh fruits and vegetables, poultry and dairy, and almond

(3) Reaffirmed their shared commitment to completing the WTO Doha Development Agenda (DDA) before the end of 2006, and agreed to work together to help achieve this outcome.

FOR ENERGY SECURITY AND A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT

(1) Welcomed the successful completion of discussions on India's separation plan and looked forward to the full implementation of the commitments in the July 18, 2005 Joint Statement on nuclear cooperation. This historic accomplishment will permit our countries to move forward towards our common objective of full civil nuclear energy cooperation between India and the United States and between India and the international community as a whole.

(2) Welcomed the participation of India in the ITER initiative on fusion energy as an important further step towards the common goal of full nuclear energy cooperation.

(3) Agreed on India's participation in FutureGen, an international public-private partnership to develop new, commercially viable technology for a clean coal near-zero emission power project. India will contribute funding to the project and participate in the Government Steering Committee of this initiative.

(4) Welcomed the creation of the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, which will enable India and the U.S. to work together with other countries in the region to pursue sustainable development and meet increased energy needs while addressing concerns of energy security and climate change. The Partnership will collaborate to promote the development, diffusion, deployment and transfer of cleaner, cost-effective and more efficient technologies and practices.

(5) Welcomed India's interest in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, an international marine research endeavor that will contribute to long-term energy solutions such as gas hydrates.

(6) Noting the positive cooperation under the Indo-U.S. Energy Dialogue, highlighted plans to hold joint conferences on topics such as energy efficiency and natural gas, to conduct study missions on renewable energy, to establish a clearing house in India for coal-bed methane/coal-mine methane, and to exchange energy market information.

FOR INNOVATION AND THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY

(1) Emphasizing the importance of knowledge partnerships, announced the establishment of a Bi-National Science and Technology Commission which the U.S. and India will co-fund. It will generate collaborative partnerships in science and technology and promote industrial research and development.

(2) Agreed that the United States and India would work together to promote innovation, creativity and technological advancement by providing a vibrant intellectual property rights regime, and to cooperate in the field of intellectual property rights to include capacity building activities, human resource development and public awareness programs.

(3) Agreed to continue exploring further cooperation in civil space, including areas such as space exploration, satellite navigation, and earth science. The United States and India committed to move forward with agreements that will permit the launch of U.S. satellites and satellites containing U.S. components by Indian space launch vehicles, opening up new opportunities for commercial space cooperation between the two countries.

(4) Welcomed the inclusion of two U.S. instruments in the Indian lunar mission Chandrayaan-1. They noted that memoranda of understanding to be signed by ISRO and NASA would be significant steps forward in this area.

(5) Welcomed the U.S. Department of Commerce's plan to create a license exception for items that would otherwise require an export license to end-users in India engaged solely in civilian activities.

FOR GLOBAL SAFETY AND SECURITY

(1) Noted the enhanced counter-terrorism cooperation between the two countries and stressed that terrorism is a global scourge that must be fought and rooted out in every part of the world.

(2) Welcomed the increased cooperation between the United States and India in the defense area, since the New Framework for the U.S.-India Defence Relationship was signed on June 28, 2005, as evidenced by successful joint exercises, expanded defence cooperation and information sharing, and greater opportunities to jointly develop technologies and address security and humanitarian issues.

(3) Reaffirmed their commitment to the protection of the free flow of commerce and to the safety of navigation, and agreed to the conclusion of a Maritime Cooperation Framework to enhance security in the maritime domain, to prevent piracy and other transnational crimes at sea, carry out search and rescue operations, combat marine pollution, respond to natural disasters, address emergent threats and enhance cooperative capabilities, including through logistics support. Both sides are working to finalize a Logistics Support Agreement at the earliest.

(4) Welcomed India's intention to join the Container Security Initiative aimed at making global maritime trade and infrastructure more secure and reducing the risk of shipping containers being used to conceal weapons of mass destruction.

(5) Reiterated their commitment to international efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

(6) Building on the July 2005 Disaster Relief Initiative, noted the important disaster management cooperation and their improved capabilities to respond to disaster situations.

(7) Recognized the importance of capacity building in cyber security and greater cooperation to secure their growing electronic interdependencies, including to protect electronic transactions and critical infrastructure from cybercrime, terrorism and other malicious threats.

DEEPENING DEMOCRACY AND MEETING INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES

(1) Recalled their joint launch of the UN Democracy Fund in September 2005 and offered the experience and expertise of both Governments for capacity building, training and exchanges to third countries that request such assistance to strengthen democratic institutions.

(2) Welcomed the decision of India and the United States to designate a representative to the Government Advisory Board of the International Centre for Democratic Transition (ICDT) located in Budapest to facilitate cooperative activities with ICDT.

(3) Agreed that the Virtual Coordination and Information Centres set up in September 2005 should be further strengthened and a bilateral meeting aimed at developing a practical programme for utilization of its services be held soon.

(4) Expressed satisfaction at the expedited USFDA drug approval processes that strengthen the combat against HIV/AIDS at the global level and encourage greater corporate participation to meet this challenge, including the establishment of the Indo-U.S. Corporate Fund for HIV/AIDS.

(5) Agreed to expand bilateral efforts and continue cooperation in the area of medical research and strengthen technical capacity in food and drug regulation in India as well as address the concern on avian influenza, including agreement to reach out to the private sector, develop regional communications strategies, and plan an in-region containment and response exercise. The President welcomed India's offer to host the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza meeting in 2007.

(6) Welcomed India's membership in the Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking, a partnership through which we will collaborate in the fight against illegal trade in wildlife and wildlife parts; we also welcome the opportunity to strengthen longstanding work together on the conservation of wildlife through cooperation on park management and ecotourism.

President Bush thanked Prime Minister Singh and the people of India for the warmth of their reception and the generosity of their hospitality.

March 2, 2006

* Joint statement of President George Bush & Prime Minister Manmohan Singh issued by the Office of the Press Secretary, White House

On US-India trade relations Sanjay Puri, Chairman of the US India Business Alliance said: “Positive trends and policies notwithstanding, there are a number of ways USINPAC believes U.S.-India trade relations can still be enhanced. One of these areas is to open discussions on forming a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two countries.” said Mr. Sanjay Puri, Chairman of the US India Political Action Committee (USINPAC) in an interview with indiaonestop.com.

USINPAC : Ambassador for India abroad

THE U.S. India Political Action Committee (USINPAC) delegation of prominent business leaders, entrepreneurs, political activists, and professionals from the Indian-American community is back home after their week-long India visit with the message from the Indian Commerce Minister Kamal Nath that the U.S.-India Civilian Nuclear Agreement process is “not thrown away”. The delegation that dialogued with senior Indian government officials at the federal and state levels about the U.S.-India relationship, the growth of the Indian economy, and other important domestic issues was told that the Indian American community plays an important ambassadorial role for India abroad.

One theme woven through all the meetings was the importance of the Indian-American community and its continued engagement, and the role played by USINPAC in encouraging, informing and fostering that engagement. "All ethnic communities abroad maintain ties to their countries of origin, but the Indian-American community is particularly strong and focused in this regard, says Sanjay Puri, USINPAC Chairman and leader of the delegation. "Just as all Diasporas are not equally connected, so too not all home countries are as welcoming of their involvement as we always see time and time again on these visits with the Indian government and the society as a whole."

The USINPAC delegation was particularly interested in what Kamal Nath, the Minister of Commerce and Industry, had to say about the status of the U.S.-India Civilian Nuclear Agreement process. "There is a delay undoubtedly in the nuclear deal but it is not thrown away," said Minister Nath. The Minister went on to emphasis that additional time in the process should not alarm anyone given that this represents very new waters for both the American and Indian governments and so too their respective citizens as well.

Another important topic for Minister Nath was the role that the Indian-American community and USINPAC can and should play as educators and advocates in the United States on the realities of globalization. The Minister sees globalization as positively intertwining and benefiting the economies of the two countries.

Ashwini Kumar, the Minister of Industry, echoed the Commerce Minister’s thanks to the Indian-American community as fulfilling an important ambassadorial role for India abroad, and described the community as catalysts of change evident in the work on the nuclear deal and how the relationship with the United States has evolved from one driven by ideology to one driven by identity. "Over ninety percent of Indians feel socially, intellectually, and even culturally closer to America than anyone else in the world," Minister Kumar stated.

While at the government and industry-business levels efforts are being stepped up and more and more initiatives taken to strengthen the Indo-US bilateral relations on all fronts -- from education and culture to foreign trade- another major contributory factor in cementing the bilateral relations between these two countries is the growing political clout of 2.5 million Indian Americans. The US India Political Action Committee (USINPAC), the voice of the Indian American community is playing a very significant a positive role with the help of the India Caucus both in the Congress and the Senate irrespective of their political shades, the most recent example  being the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement. USINPAC's grassroots analysts have found that regardless of whether Indian Americans are registered Republicans or Democrats, the community is united in its desire to see the successful conclusion of the US-India Nuclear Agreement.

Now with the passage of confidence reposed in the Congress(I)-led UPA government by the majority of peoples' representatives in country's Parliament, India is now all set to finalize the Safegurads Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and later on to scale it up to Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) as a follow up of signing the 123 Act with the US for civilian nuclear cooperation in 2007. The Draft Safeguards Agreement with IAEA, once finalized, will "enable India to cooperate in civil nuclear energy development with all the 45 member countries of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, including USA, Russia, France and China", claims country's Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. However, the four-party Left alliance that had been supporting the Congress(I)-led UPA government for last four years withdrew its support apprehending that the Safeguards Agreement with IAEA would threaten India's sovereignty. The Prime Minister  will have to burry the Left apprehension in due course making all the Civilian Nuclear agreement related issues more transparent and convincing.

"The IAEA safeguards agreement will enable India to cooperate in civil nuclear energy development with all the 45 member countries of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, including USA, Russia, France and China. He said that concluding the agreements would end the era of nuclear apartheid against India. He said the agreement will in no way impinge on our strategic programme, which is entirely outside the purview of the IAEA safeguards agreement", the Prime Minister told the senior journalists on July 15.He asserted that  "India would never allow any extraneous interference in the conduct of its independent foreign policy and India would continue to seek good relations with all our Asian neighbours."

In fact, about a year back after the signing of the Indo-US Civilian Nuclear Cooperation Agreement Indian External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee had belied the apprehension of those opposed to the 123 Agreement and said: "India has the sovereign right to test and would do so if it is necessary in national interest. The only restraint in our voluntary unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing, declared by the previous government and being continued by the successor government. There is nothing in the bilateral agreement that would tie the hands of a future government or legally constrain its options. A decision to undertake a future nuclear test would be India’s sovereign decision, resting solely with the Government of India.

Nowhere in the bilateral agreement on Cooperation for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy with the United States of America is testing mentioned. The bilateral cooperation agreement contains elaborate provisions in Articles 5 and 14 to ensure the continuous operation of India’s reactors. These include fuel supply assurances, the right to take corrective measures, and a strategic fuel reserve for the lifetime of India’s reactors in case of cessation of cooperation."

 

On the other hand the Opposition Leader in Parliament L. K. Advani said "the BJP wants to see friendly relations between India and the United States. Indeed, as the world’s largest democracy and the world’s strongest democracy, I believe that our two countries should forge a strategic partnership to pursue common goals. It goes without saying that India should also simultaneously deepen friendship and cooperation with all the other major powers – Russia, Japan and others -- in today’s world, which we want to see as a multi-polar world tomorrow. A multi-polar world in which India itself becomes an important pole, working for the welfare of the entire mankind.

"..we want a strategic partnership with the US on equal terms. The BJP will never support a relationship with any country, howsoever strong and powerful it may be, in which India becomes its client or a subservient partner" he  said in Parliament on July 21.

"The Nuclear Deal in its present form is nothing but acceptance of severe curbs on our strategic weapons programme. All the American interlocutors, whether belong to the Republican Party or the Democratic Party or are independent experts, have made it clear that, as far as their country is concerned, their principal objective is to bring India into the Non-Proliferation Regime. What they want fits in well with the critical stand that Dr. Manmohan Singh took after Pokharan II in 1998. Both want India to come within the Non-Proliferation Regime dictated by the US.

"Therefore, the Nuclear Deal in its present form means that India will not be allowed to perform Pokharan III or Pokharan IV, without inviting termination of the agreement and severe punitive action. This is unacceptable to my party, to the NDA, to the majority of MPs in this House, and to the people at large", Advani said.

Commenting on Indian Parliament’s clearance of the government’s move to operatiolaize the nuke deal once it is through at IAEA and NSG levels the US-India Political Action Committee (USINPAC) chairman Sanjay Puri said: "As this is a truly historic accord, so too this is a historic victory for the government of Prime Minister Singh and all Indians. The agreement benefits both countries on several levels, strategically, politically and economically, and it will usher in a new positive era of broadened and deepened cooperation between the oldest democracy and the largest democracy."

"We will rally the Indian-American community and engage all like-minded allies to ensure this deal gets included in the US Congressional calendar for this year. We look forward to the day that this important milestone in US-India relations is finalized," he said.

The growing political clout of the Indian American community also reflected in the sweeping victory of Piyush 'Bobby' Jindal in the race to Louisiana Governorship.


India Inc.: Deepening engagement *

"India Inc's engagement with the world has deepened significantly since 2000, with trade and investment flows in and out of India at historic highs and rising rapidly. 

The increased flow of investment in and out of India is especially significant.  India's global FDI has been surging - tripling in the first half of this year to roughly $11 billion - on the heels of last year's record $16 billion for the entire year.  These numbers, which for nearly a decade stayed around $3 billion annually, now reflect India's growth and dynamism.  

New areas of investment have come up in the wake of successful reforms, including financial service companies, construction (including highways), telecom and transportation.  In fact, investment in the services sector last year surged ahead of IT, while construction investment grew by a factor of six. 

FDI from the U.S. has now begun to fulfill expectations.  Although the U.S. has been India's largest investor for many years, flows hovered for years around a modest average of $400 million annually.  Now, American investment is growing by 50% per year - to nearly $900 million in FY07.  If we could track investments made through Mauritius, this number would no doubt be considerably higher. 

Notable too, last year saw the convergence of institutional and direct investment.  Historically, portfolio investment has vastly outstripped FDI, but in FY07, FDI beat Foreign Institutional Investment, reflecting investors' growing confidence in India's long-term future, rather than the attractions of current high valuations.

Just as powerful is the surge in outward FDI, putting India on the map as a source, not just a destination, for investment. 

Last year, India Inc. invested $9 billion outside India, more than quadrupling a rough average of $2 billion in the first part of this decade.  Tata's Corus deal and Hindalco's purchase of Novelis helped propel India's outbound mergers and acquisitions during the first half of 2007 to second place in the world behind Australia.   U.S. financial firms are helping Indian corporations utilize global capital to become major players and employers in world markets.

Demonstrating the two way nature of Indo-U.S. economic engagement, the U.S. has long been one of the largest recipients of Indian investment, receiving roughly one-fifth of India's investments abroad.  Indian investment in the U.S. is now spreading from an IT focus into other sectors, including pharmaceuticals and manufacturing, such as the Mahindras' tractor factories in the U.S.

Certainly, these multiple facets of India's deeper engagement with the global economy have helped propel India's growth rate to 9 percent levels, a feat that should be repeated this year, again helping to raise people out of poverty and bringing more into India's middle class.

These market-changing investment flows reflect how India's private sector is clearly exploiting the benefits of recent reforms and liberalization, driving economic growth and employment.  Continued reform and liberalization will help further boost this surging momentum and spread the benefits of rapid economic growth to more recipients across India. 

One engine to advance macroeconomic activity across India is further liberalization in India's banking and financial markets.

*Extracts from speech delivered by David C. Mulford, US Ambassador to India at the 4th Indo-U.S. Economic Summit "Building Strong Partnerships" on September 18, 2007
 

The Indian government had effected a large number of tariff reductions three years back in 2004. Major relief included: Reduction of peak tariff rates by 5 percent, to 20 percent; Elimination of the 4 percent special additional duty; Reduction of customs duties on equipment for projects from 25 percent to 10 percent; Reductions in duties on meters and items related to electricity transmission and distribution; Sharp reductions on information technology and electronic equipment, including cell phones and computers; Major reductions in life-saving drugs and equipment, and other medical items; Reduction or elimination of excises and taxes on air travel, air fuel and related items; Exemption from custom and excise duties available to drinking water supply projects. In addition, the Government of India announced several measures to streamline customs processing, ease restrictions on imports of personal or household products, and enable electronic tax filing.


India's trade with USA ( FY 2002-03 to 2006-07
(In million $)

  2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Export 10,895.76 11,490.11 13,765.75 17,353.06 18,866.17
India's Total Export 52,719.43 63,842.97 83,535.94 103.090.54 126,361.46
% Share 20.67 18 16.48 16.83 14.93
Import 4,443.58 5,034.86 7,001.35 9,454.74 11,736.13
India's Total Import 61,412.13 61,412.13 78,149.61 111,517.44 149,165.73
% Share 7.24 6.44 6.28 6.34 6.32
Total Trade 15,339.34 16,524.97 20,767.10 26807.81 30,602.30
India's Total Trade 114,131.56 141,992.58 195,053.38 252,256.27 312,110.76
% Share 13.44 11.64 10.65 10.63 9.8
Trade balance 6,452.18 6,455.25 6,764.40 7,898.32 7,130.04
India's Trade Balance -8692.70 -14,306.65 -27,981.49 -46,075.19 -59,387.85
Exchange rate ($ 1= Rs) 48.3953 45.9513 44.9315 44.2735 45.2495

SOURCE: Federal Ministry of Commerce, Government of India

FY : Financial Year ( April-March)

All these led to substantial reduction in average tariff rate in India. From average of 35.3 percent with a peak of 260 percent in 1997-98 (as stated in a WTO report) it has come down substantially to 19.5 percent in 2005. For fiscal 2006-07, the rate for agri products stood at 30 percent and 12.5 percent for non-agri products. There are certain items, textiles mainly,  that fall under two-track duty system- one calculated on a percentage basis and the other is on kilogram or square metre basis. Despite a much more liberalized tariff and import policy, the USTR report ( 2007) on Trade Barriers has pointed out to Indian Customs authorities complicated documentation procedures and application of discretionary customs valuation criteria to import transactions. The report also made special mention about India's standards and certification requirements. The scientific basis of the standards is questioned in the report.


Making history............

I
N less than a year since the Republican became the first Indian-American to be elected to the US Congress in 46 years, the 36-year-old non-white Rhodes Scholar and the first Indian-American to head a state, Piyush ‘Bobby’ Jindal’s outright win in Louisiana Governor’s race once again proved the growing and strong political clout of the Indian-American community. Stating that Jindal “ is a role model for young Indian-Americans who look to public service as a life mission” The youngest US Governor-elect however retorted back during his campaign trail: “people want to make everything about race. The only colors that matter here are red, white and blue.”  Referring to the proposed legislation on real ethics reform Jindal in his victory speech said : "But please understand this: I'm not going to take "no" for an answer on reforming our ethics laws. 


Piyush ‘Bobby’ Jindal
(born June 10, 1971, in Baton Rouge), a Rhodes scholar, was elected the first non-white Governor-elect of the U.S. State of Louisiana on the Republican ticket. He was Louisiana's health secretary at age 24, president of the University of Louisiana at age 28.  President George W. Bush appointed him as Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services at age 30. Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from the 1st district of Louisiana at age 33, and re-elected to the same seat in the U.S. Congress by an overwhelming 88 percent majority in 2006.  

The first Indian American governor in U.S. history got 54 percent of the total vote. His nearest rival, Democrat Walter Boasso got 18 percent. Outgoing Democratic Governor Kathleen Blanco decided to not run again after she was widely criticized for her handling of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina crisis. Jindal took his oath as Governor of Louisiana on January 14, 2008. 

ETHICS : THE CENTERPIECE

AS the first Indian-American elected as governor and the youngest sitting governor at the age of thirty-six, Governor Bobby Jindal looks to continue making history by fulfilling his campaign pledge of ridding the state of Louisiana of its reputation for corrupt government. After his inauguration Monday, some of Governor Jindal's first executive orders created new financial disclosure rules for cabinet members and established transparency of how tax dollars are spent by posting a report online of all state grants and contracts so taxpayers will know where their money is going.

"Governor Jindal made ethics a centerpiece of his campaign, but previous reform-minded governors in Louisiana have had short-lived careers," says Michael Taylor, Director of Government Affairs for the U.S.-India Business Alliance (USIBA). "If he is to be successful in rewriting history here, then he will need a great deal of help; both political and economic help and local and national help," he added.

State Representative Jane Smith (District 8), the newly elected Chair of the House Republican Delegation, told USIBA that "truly there is a feeling of great excitement that with Bobby Jindal as our Governor we will be able to move the reform agenda forward. I support Governor Jindal in his efforts to change the image of this state, give tax relief to our businesses and better manage the budget of this state. It will take support from Democrats
as well as Republicans, and I believe we will have that. I

also believe that the powerful 50 delegation Republicans in the House will be the catalyst to move that reform agenda forward. It's a bright day in Louisiana." 

The other focus contained in the first executive orders of Governor Jindal is the rebuilding of post-Katrina Louisiana. USIBA calls on the Indian-American business community to assist him in that rebuilding. Those parts of the American economy where Indian-Americans are most prevalent as business leaders - hospitali